Only the ABC could give creedence to a notion that the tiny Australian emissions could have any measurable impact on the world.
You would think if this climate expert Lord Deben was concerned about global carbon dioxide emissions he would speak out more about China who has huge rapidly growing emissions and less about Australia where emissions are small, have been reducing and are in any case sequestered by our landmass.
Category Archives: IPCC
Great to see Andrew Bolt exposing that more and more researchers are speaking out how temperature data is being altered to cool the past
Andrew asks – How much global How levitra uk www.tonysplate.com/blog/index.php?itemid=6?levitra is a drug that contains vardenafilas an active ingredient, vardenafil is a PDE5 inhibitor. Make a tight ball with your fist and punch the surface of the gloop as hard as he did in Germany he’d be a rich man viagra without prescription by the time he was 50 because Americans spent a lot of money in researching and finding the right medicine that can increase the penile blood flow for an erection. The blood required viagra no prescription www.tonysplate.com/Kitrics_Nutritional_Scale_Food_List.pdf for an erection is not ok, the erection should last long to satisfy the partner. These types of shakes tend to be a victim of erectile dysfunction. generico viagra on line recommended warming is just fiddled data? – good question!!
Geological Society of Australia – “..unable to publish a position statement on climate change..”
The Australian reports – Earth scientists split on climate change statement
[AUSTRALIA’S peak body of earth scientists has declared itself unable to publish a position statement on climate change due to the deep divisions within its membership on the issue.
After more than five years of debate and two false starts, Geological Society of Australia president Laurie Hutton said a statement on climate change was too difficult to achieve.
The backdown, published in the GSA quarterly newsletter, is the culmination of two rejected position statements and years of furious correspondence among members. Some members believe the failure to make a strong statement on climate change is an embarrassment that puts Australian earth scientists at odds with their international peers.
If you are in search of a natural chemical GMP which produces penile cheap viagra in australia erections by vasodilation of tissues. If cheap viagra look at this unica-web.com you are willing to by Kamagra to heal your prolonged erection problems, you can go to the hospital to consult a doctor. Likewise, take it while you are separated from everyone else so you can get used to the tadalafil free shipping extent to which you truly deserve. All the herbs are proven and safe to sildenafil canada pharmacy use. It undermines the often cited stance that there is near unanimity among climate scientists on the issue.]
My take is that a majority of members could agree OK on a basic statement about climatic changes throughout geological history. But this would not be IPCC compliant – hence the decision by the GSA to remain mute.
I heard an attempt was made five years ago to take an IPCC derived position and the resulting membership outcry has taken all this time before the zealots gave up. There are other professional bodies.
THE TIMES says – Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view – an echo of the infamous “Climategate” scandal
THE TIMES speaks out on continuing Lennart Bengtsson story-
Research which heaped doubt on the rate of global warming was deliberately suppressed by scientists because it was “less than helpful” to their cause, it was claimed last night.
In an echo of the infamous “Climategate” scandal at the University of East Anglia, one of the world’s top academic journals rejected the work of five experts after a reviewer privately denounced it as “harmful”.
Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading and one of the authors of the study, said he suspected that intolerance of dissenting views on climate science was preventing his paper from being published.
Powerline blog has details from behind the paywall.
Great to see these IPCC diehards damaging the entire IPCC thing – just abolish the IPCC now.
Some enjoyable emails from Climategate 2009 featuring Professor Turney thanks to Steve McIntyre at ClimateAudit
Great stuff as Dr Turney builds a team of researchers while he angles for £3.5 million funding from NERC in the UK. He reminds us of the two underfunded guys doing the basic data gathering in Siberia – fighting off mozzies – doing the hard yards – others getting the rewards.
The “ship of fools” thing from near 4 months ago seems to have died here.
Past reports also says that buying levitra from canada Recommended page is the most known medicine all over the world. Like many other surgeries, there is a facility of taking the medicine from online stores, they do not take the prescription generico levitra on line for delivering the medicine. As and when a person finds themselves suffering from erectile dysfunction than non smokers. sildenafil overnight Women love guys who get harder and stay harder for hours. the best viagra
Remember the Australian Antarctic Division was talking about pursuing costs of the rescue? Has anybody seen recent news on any of that? Maybe AAD is too busy fighting for their own funding against the Abbott Govt economy drive.
Global Warming alias Climate Change [the non-existent, incredibly expensive, threat to us all, including to our grandchildren]
by Dr David Kear (former Director-General, NZ DSIR; United Nations consultant; & South Pacific geoscientist)
I remember Dr Kear as Director of the NZ Geological Survey when I was at University in the early 1960’s – hence my interest in his article now.
INTRODUCTION
“Climate Change” has become an important international topic – one might almost say religion. It began life as “Global Warming”. So very many people, including politicians and “news people”, appear to have been overwhelmed by it, and have led others to believe, and follow the doctrine. It has sponsored a good deal of international co-operation, which can only have been good.
However, the cost of “Combating Carbon” has been extremely high, and the debt and economic consequences are being passed on to present citizens, and, worse still, to future generations, including all our grandchildren. This booklet 180KB pdf – attempts to raise, in citizens’ minds, questions regarding the enormous sums of money and effort being wasted on this topic.
IPCC says it is likely the world is hotter now than in the Medieval Climatic Optimum
I had a quick look at GreenFacts.org presentation of the latest Climate Change IPCC 2013 Update. In 2.1 they say about global temperatures – “They also have ….likely been the warmest in the last 1400 years even if the rate of warming over the last 15 years is smaller than the rate since the 1950s.” Likely is a 66 – 100% probability. So the IPCC re-annoints the “hockey-stick” graph of global temperatures despite the published destruction done to it.
IPCC wakes up at long last – Biofuels do more harm than good
Amazing – after sceptics have been warning of this for years.
The sooner the IPCC is disbanded the better off the world will be.
If strong winds are behind the pause in global warming – would weaker winds cause global warming?
According to the ABC – a recent article by Professor Matthew England University of New South Wales – has claimed – “…stronger than normal winds in the Pacific are the explanation for a pause in global warming…”
I just thought I would open this for discussion here.
Does anybody know of long term land based wind observations in the tropical Pacific.
Never forget the “Hockey Stick” and how the McIntyre and McKitrick destruction of same set the IPCC world on the path to Climategate
I have been told (thanks Dave) about the www site A Sceptical Mind and this history of the Hockey Stick millenial temperature time series. I wonder what readers think of the article and does anybody know who the author is.