Late 19th Century photographic evidence of the Stevenson Screen in Australian meteorology
June 14th, 2010 by Warwick HughesI notice over at wattsupwiththat.com
Luke comments: June 13, 2010 at 4:39 am
[El Gordo remarks about temperatures pre 1900 being higher but gee if we’re into UHI issues – those data were recorded in a Glaisher stand. That’s why.]
Not so Luke.
Luke is repeating the standard BoM excuse to avoid facing the facts that many Australian stations recorded a warm period in the late 19th Century – the BoM (and Luke) claim that these warm temperatures were recorded in an older style open thermometer stand (often a Glaisher stand in Australia).
Sadly for the BoM and Luke, Colonial historical records from the late 1800′s are increasingly revealing that the Stevenson screen was in widespread use. That is not to say that older exposures were completely done away with, of course not – but for high order stations the Stevenson screen was being introduced from the 1880′s. See my scanned 1995 4 page paper from the International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 15. In that I reviewed proceedings from Intercolonial Conferences that touched on meteorological subjects. In the early 1990′s I was only able to find the one photograph – from the Darwin Post Office yard in 1890 – which showed a Stevenson screen pre 1900 (see my scanned page 233).
Now thanks to correspondents who have kindly sent me information – I am aware that various Australian archives and libraries – both State and Commonwealth – have searchable online collections of photographs and newspapers from the colonial period. Just a few examples now.
Melbourne 1879 – from Museum Victoria.

Another lucky preservation from Tasmanian Archives from ~1900 Hobart, St George’s Terrace, Battery Point, circa 1900 damaged – person is Leventhorpe Hall.

Here is an extract from The West Australian Wednesday 25 October 1899 page 4 – The meteorological report for 1898, prepared by Mr. W. E. Cooke.

A Stevenson screen at Kings Park Perth WA -

can be seen in this 1899 photograph.
From remote far north Colonial Queensland comes this 1896 photo of a Stevenson screen at Musgrave telegraph station

For larger image ex National Archives of Australia.
Added 16 June after readers start finding online examples of pre-1900 Stevenson screens for themselves.
I have a few photographs from the Brisbane Meterological Observatory – Wickham Tce. Clement Wragge was appointed Govt. Meteorologist there in 1887.
This scene sent to me as hard copy from the State Library of Queensland as “View from Windmill looking east” – ca 1890 – three Stevenson screens can be see in the Observatory yard.

This scene from sent to me from the State Library of Queensland is from their Hartshorn Family Photographs – and is I believe the first location of Wragge’s Stevenson screens which is on the opposite side of the Observatory to the above photograph.

The Stevenson screens were I think moved to the opposite side of the building and several photos turn up in searches – some showing telephone poles and increased tree plantings in the Terrace.
Such as this scene cropped from a larger photograph.

If you search the Queensland Library site you will find more images – such as this later circa 1900 view photograph with instruments on the windmill side of the Observatory.
Links to my published papers on the introduction of the Stevenson Screen to Australia – and related papers all available now in pdf versions.
Posted in BoM Australia, News and Views, Surface Record | 10 Comments »
June 15th, 2010 at 7:15 am
Thought this post might interest…see Fig 2. Long length stations at Cape Shank and Queenscliff compared to Melbourne CBD and Laverton highlight UHI affect around Melbourne CBD.
abcnewswatch.blogspot.com/2010/06/butterflies-fly-early-as-planet.html
June 16th, 2010 at 1:39 am
Here’s a mention from The Queenslander 5 March 1887:
“Shade Temperature (thermometers exposed in enlarged Stevenson screen” Brisbane observatory
newspapers.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/19923195
June 16th, 2010 at 1:45 am
Try this one from The Argus 22 Sept 1879
newspapers.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5956462
June 16th, 2010 at 3:35 am
Thanks for all that effort MarcH. I am surprised the ABC have published the article critical of the “Great Butterfly Study”.
June 16th, 2010 at 4:40 am
WSH, That was ABC NEWS WATCH…not the ABC!
June 16th, 2010 at 5:35 am
Thanks for putting me right – must keep an eye on what they do.
June 19th, 2010 at 4:37 pm
A reader has kindly sent in this pre-1880 photograph from the Melbourne Observatory.
Also I found this 1900 photograph from Tasmania
November 10th, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Interesting article at
wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/10/gross-data-errors-in-ghcn-v2-for-australia/#more-27653
Guest post by Ed Thurstan of Sydney, Australia
Synopsis
This study shows that the NOAA maintained GHCN V2 database contains errors in calculating a Mean temperature from a Maximum and a Minimum. 144 years of data from 36 Australian stations are affected.
Means are published when the underlying Maximums and/or Minimums have been rejected.
I note there’s a full list of the affected stations available on request
Warwick you might like to make a comment
January 10th, 2011 at 1:02 pm
Here’s a fascinating historical account to which el gordo at Dr Marohassy’s blog directed me and which other readers might be interested in
climatehistory.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Environmental-History-2010-Gergis-envhis_emq079.pdf
January 10th, 2011 at 5:56 pm
Thanks for the heads up Val – a great read – 40′s in November without 200 yrs of UHI expansion !! Shades of 2009. I wonder what happened to the rain data ?