Our ANZAC history could be put in perspective

The Australian War Memorial has this to say introducing the bloody Gallipoli landings.
The Gallipoli campaign was intended to force Germany’s ally, Turkey, out of the war. It began as a naval campaign, with British battleships sent to attack Constantinople (now Istanbul). This failed when the warships were unable to force a way through the straits known as the Dardanelles. A third of the battleships were sunk or disabled on a single day, 18 March 1915. Could the AWM say any less?

You get all the benefits of these sex herbs which are more powerful when compared to their cosmetic or chemical counterparts. Both of you are married and share a deeprootsmag.org cheap professional viagra life together. Do not consider levitra free consultation it a regular treatment that need specific on daily basis. Proviron, or Nolvadex or another anti-estrogen product is used during cycles with this steroid in order to combat estrogen-linked side effects of Testover C (Testosterone Cypionate).Besides of estrogen-related adverse reactions, this medication may cause allergy, abdominal pains, nausea, loss of appetite, weight gains, headaches, dizziness, generic viagra on sale breathing problems, unusual changes in mood, persistent erections, abnormal changes in sex drive, baldness, acne, weakness, liver problems, kidney disorders, etc.Fortunately, some unwanted consequences. Most of the lost battleships were old. For a start – it was not Turkey – we were fighting the Ottoman Empire who as the AWM says were an ally of Germany. I think Australians are capable of grasping the following sketch history from early WWI. The Ottoman Navy lead by the German battlecruiser SMS Goeben and the light cruiser SMS Breslau had already attacked the Black Sea coast of Russia in October 1914. The Ottomans had a large army advised by the German General Otto Liman von Sanders and in Jan-Feb 1915 had attempted a raid on the Suez Canal. The Ottomans Army engaged in dozens of operations during the war from the Caucasus to Iraq and Egypt generally tied up many Allied troops that could have been otherwise employed fighting Germany in France. See the many engagements listed all linked.
Seizing the Dardanelles was a worthwhile war aim which the Allies had the forces to achieve and had the entire March-April 1915 campaign been better administered from the top the war could likely have been shortened.

6 thoughts on “Our ANZAC history could be put in perspective”

  1. Yup, pity the Dardanelles campaign was cocked up. Like you say if it was successful it may have shortened the war.

    I had a Great Uncle KIA in Jordan and my grand father got his backside severely shrapnelled at the beginning of the Passchendaele action.

    Luckily he survived else I wouldn’t be here but my uncles body was never found.
    A few months shortening of the war would have saved both of them.

    The Dardanelles offensive was cocked up by having ships reconnoiter where the main fleet would go some days before the offensive. Unfortunately the Turks were not silly and put a few mines in the way when they correctly interpreted the ships as testing the area. (Its mentioned briefly here)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_operations_in_the_Dardanelles_Campaign#Battle_of_18_March

    Also it seems that the forts on the Dardanelles were almost out of ammo and were ready to surrender. But the British and allies quit first, possibly by less than 60 mins from victory it appears.

    Cheers

    Roger
    www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpres.com

  2. Warwick,

    Thank you for making the distinction between Turkey and the Ottoman Empire.

    And while many Allied commanders failed miserably at Gallipoli it was the making of Monash – who started the war as part-time soldier. He ended the campaign as Brigadier General, I believe, and with a CB despite malicious rumors that he was a “German spy”. His parents were Prussians and the family spoke German at home.

    And many forget that Indian Army and French forces were involved in the invasion. The latter were prominent on the eastern side of the Dardanelles.

  3. The family has an ancestor who was in an Irish Regiment in India – also served in Crimea then New Zealand wars. We had an ancestor in the Boer War. Six relatives served in WWI from both sides of the family – 4 in Army and 2 Nurses all came home. In WWII members of both sides of the family served with the NZ 3rd Division in the Pacific in Fiji, New Caledonia and the Solomons and all came home. My wife lost her father on the destroyer HMS Ardent taking on the Scharnhorst off Narvik 8 June 1940. She had an Uncle who was a Marine on HMS Exeter lost in the Battle of the Java sea 1 March 1940. He survived a series of Japanese camps and settled in Perth where some ex POW’s were brought to regain what they could of their health.
    I have family history photos arranged by decade – here is the 1940’s
    www.warwickhughes.com/kiwialbum/1940/40index.html
    and these are photogrophs of NZ casualties from the Weekly News 27 October 1943 – If we assume NZ was in WWII for 6 years and lost 11,671 dead then that is ~37 to 38 killed on average each week for the 312 weeks. Might cause us to think. The 1939 population was ~1.6Million.
    www.warwickhughes.com/kiwialbum/1940/cas.gif

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.