Why not the RAAF to operate large air tankers?

The aircraft could be used for navigation training or Govt freighters when not fire fighting. Aim for 24 hour fire fighting capability. They could operate in other countries when called on.

The mission should be No 1 to put fires out where lives are at risk – spraying retardant on bush could come after suppressing fires. The medicine was initially invented as the raw product to deal with pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). They may laugh or cry for no reason, preferring to be alone, have difficulty socializing with others, are attached to objects, not seeking eye contact, not responding to normal teaching methods or behave as would be deaf, although tests show results for normal hearing. you can try this out online viagra pills You levitra order prescription can buy vigrux plus cheap from many online stores. This is where the ignorance of such massive number of discount levitra men is leading to so many problems across families around the globe. The aircraft should always be under RAAF control who would liaise with on-ground fire fighters where the RAAF could have ground observing & communications staff. Night ops should take advantage of generally quieter wind and the RAAF should have state of the art remote sensing to map night-time fire as navigation guidance.
As 747’s are being phased out of Airlines there should be paddocks full of surplus multi-engined aircraft and spares in abundance. Current expert pilots and crew could be offered commissions – I am sure there is a way.

13 thoughts on “Why not the RAAF to operate large air tankers?”

  1. The Australian bush will burn. It’s just a question of when.

    Stopping a fire this year just increases the chances next year.

    If people live in bushland, let them be responsible for keeping the bush clear of their property, or installing fire suppresant systems.

    The problem isn’t bushfires. It’s people living in the bush. In the West we get huge bushfires where nobody lives, and they are just ignored.

  2. Unfortunately, one cannot just ignore the inoffensive bushfires, as the pro-Global-Warming Media is always there whipping up a frenzy with close up views of twigs burning. Attacking fires with the RAAF would be good low level flying practice for the RAAF. They might also spot the Arsonists at work too.

  3. The Australian bush needs to burn about every 5 to 7 years. This can be either by controlled burns on a rotational basis, or left to lightning and arsonists causing real wild fires. West Australia at least does some of the controlled stuff, but I can’t speak for other States.
    Here in the Kimberley, the approach is to do scattered burns from the air, at a time of the year when it’s hard to burn, with Ranger help on the ground where they have access. The last few years have been a success.

  4. In an ideal world I agree housing should not be zoned in fire-prone areas. But that train left the station decades ago. Australians have a half a century old love affair with their bush blocks. I just amended the aircraft mission to be around protecting people.
    I do recall fires near Goulburn (NSW) within the last decade where fire-fighters lives were risked around some caves where “there were glow-worms”.
    If anybody has a link?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.