4 thoughts on “Concise reminder of IPCC failings”

  1. “Could we import him?”

    Please feel free but importers need to be aware that Rodney is something of a loose cannon which, of course, can do extensive damage to one’s own ship of state.

  2. “Dissent is simply ignored” is simply rubbish,as any cursory examination of the review process and drafts illustrates. This is a very weak piece of bluster from Hide,and certainly doesn’t rate as ‘discussion’. A real discussion would examine the IAC findings in detail and compare them to the IPCC’s responses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>