David Archibald for the Senate in WA

David is standing under the Fraser Anning Conservative National Party banner and is pro our vital resources industry, he is against the current policy hysteria re climate, he is pro our Defence spending being beefed up, he is pro improving our fuel security by increasing our fuels stocks, he advocates a coal to liquids CTL industry in Australia which will also increase our fuels security. My many blog articles re David’s writings.
IMHO for WA people he would be a great No 1 Senate vote and then specify your preferences carefully.

10 thoughts on “David Archibald for the Senate in WA”

  1. Thanks Warwick. Our advice is to number every square above the line on the Senate ballot and put the greens last. Otherwise you may help elect a green.

    Fraser Anning will be in Perth next Saturday to announce candidates, policies and meet supporters.

  2. Anning has been hounded by the media and all sides of politics (almost more sides in politics than there are genders – according to the Greens).
    I cant find too much wrong with what he has had to say.
    His downside might be that he attracts extreme right wing nut cases.
    I am hopeful that the public takes care in allocating upper house votes and preferences. We can well do without the Lambies, Wilkies, Palmers and Hinchs of this world.

  3. Working thru the ballot paper from the top.
    One Nation we know but what has Peter Georgiou done? Who is the other guy?
    Western Australia, who are they, anybody right of centre?
    Nationals, anybody right of centre?
    Conservatives, so these are the Cory Bernardi group.
    Christians, name is plain but anybody right of centre?
    Liberal Democrats, ditto name is plain but anybody right of centre?
    Flux, ?? , any comments.
    Conservative Nationals we know.
    CEC, Citizens Electoral Council, should be right of centre?
    SFF, Shooters Fishers Farmers, ditto should be right of centre?
    Yellow Vest, Debbie Robinson was a leading light in ALA so I would have her high on my list.
    Ungrouped, can anybody help with those names? Any gems in there?

  4. Francois,
    Those who are inclined to want to destroy human life by bombing mosques.
    Those who are intolerant of other races.
    Unfortunately, these nut cases seem to be attracted to Anning.
    Anning himself does not share those views, but they see him as a beacon.

  5. Queensland will be a battle for the 5th & 6th place. I would say for the senate vote below the line, number 12 boxes and leave out the Greens, Sustainable and the ALP. Ian MacDonald is a North Qld country person put in 4th place on the LNP list. He is advocating voting below the line. He could well fill 5th place. Malcolm Roberts ( previously elected and disqualified) is standing again for ON. He deserves to get back as one of the few sane voices. Fraser Anning took Malcolm’s place. One hopes the Green senator Larissa Waters who was elected then disqualified and then filled a vacancy when the replacement resigned does not get back and receives a reduced vote. Voting below the line and leaving out the Greens will ensure no preference goes to the Greens

  6. Remember the recent blog here just 2 down “Senate candidate sus of BoM”. Sounds like he might make a very level and sensible Senator.
    Keep Queensland Senate candidate Gerard Rennick in mind.

  7. Thanks Warwick. I had not seen the actual ballot paper. A bit more complicated than I thought with so many names- 9 in HofR Greens 3rd in ballot will get my number 9. The present rep will get in easily with increased majority. I will voting below the line in the senate where there are 83 candidates. I will leave out the Greens. Fairly sure that one or two of my preferences will fill the 5th or 6th place to hold back bad legislation in the senate.
    Beachgirl, he is in my list of 12 but in the 2nd half.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.