“Species botherers” waste taxpayers money in Antarctica

So they put heated panels in the sea and were surprised when marine growth was different to unheated panels – WOW – who could not have forseen that?? Then the classic conclusion – “Beyond that(1-2 degrees C), we’re not really sure what would happen. You could see some catastrophic differences.” Yair, catastrophe will get more funds in.

2 thoughts on ““Species botherers” waste taxpayers money in Antarctica”

  1. “representing the predicted water temperature increases for the region over the next 50 and 100 years”

    That’s the hole in their reasoning!

    Cheers Roger

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *