Turnbull has a new version carbon tax all ready and legislated

This Australian Climate Sceptics blog article says it all – The Red Hunt planned an October Carbon Tax – What can “right of As for the abnormal vaginal discharge, it is usually necessary to continue checking 2~3 times or more. People have to be serious about it and they really need to start looking out for a better relaxation with your sildenafil mastercard partner. Do not double the dose in viagra in canada www.4frontimports.com/wines/a-d-wines case of ED. Even the foreplay and your dirty talk won’t be cheap viagra for sale very effective. centre” voters do? – Personally I could not vote for GreenLabor but I swear my 1st Preference vote will not give $2.60 to the Liberals.

5 thoughts on “Turnbull has a new version carbon tax all ready and legislated”

  1. There is little or no chance of ever injecting anything resembling logic into either the Labor or Greens policy platforms. However, there is a chance that the Coalition could one day be returned to the policies that represent its traditional core values. Unfortunately the only way such a reform is likely to be initiated within the Coalition would be for Turnbull to lose the election and be shown the door. Time spent in the wilderness has a way of concentrating the mind.
    The obvious down side is the economic and social cost of subjecting the country to another three years of socialist/green chaos.

  2. You’ve summed it up pretty well Bob In Castlemaine: I have the advantage of living in an electorate that runs both Lib and Nats candidates. Last election it was a knife edge and Libs won, got my vote too. Not this time, my 1st preference will go to Nats.

    Also find out which senators in your state voted for Turnbull and put them down the bottom.

    Who voted for who, find out here truebluenz.com/2015/10/12/updated-list-australian-liberal-party-who-voted-for-malcolm-turnbull-to-replace-tony-abbott/

  3. TedM there is another bit of mischief afoot here courtesy of the Government and the AEC.  You may have seen the AEC ads telling voters that they have to number at least six boxes when they vote above the line for the Senate.  This advice is deliberately misleading, numbering a single box or any number of boxes above the line is a valid vote.  Larry Pickering has also exposed this deliberate ruse.  Some of us, me included, would contend that there aren’t any more than three or four parties worthy of our vote.

  4. @Bob in …

    Yes, the AEC is not an impartial monolith.

    The dirty imbroglio with “missing” Senate votes in WA, 2013, alerted us to this. The bundle of votes went “missing” AFTER being first counted, so its’ true value in numbers was then known by the WA AEC officials.

    Yes, the AFP decided it was all a big mystery. But all one has to do is ask: “Who benefited ?” … too easy.

  5. I was surprised to hear of the Prime Minister making derogatory comments about Pauline Hanson – Malcolm Turnbull says Pauline Hanson not welcome in politics –
    www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-31/election-blog-live-may-31/7460798
    Not worthy of our PM and would quite likely increase votes for PH.
    Also today some new national accounts numbers out – GDP: Australia’s economy grows 3.1pc, fastest quarterly growth since 2012, says ABS
    www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-01/gdp-march-quarter-abs-economic-growth-data/7466424
    So the countless headlines and “main-stream-meedja” prognostications about the “death of the mining boom” might be a trifle overstated. Great to hear – “…production growth was mainly down to mining, up 6.2 per cent over the quarter,”. Six point two!! (it might be down next quarter) All this talk about – how does it go now – “transformation to a post mining economy” – did I get that near right? All Bull Dust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.