Errors in IPCC climate science

• Home
• A Critical Examination of Climate Change
• About the authors

4 Responses

1. Demesure Says:
   July 17th, 2007 at 4:39 am

   Hi,
   Here is a try. Feell free to delete this post.

2. Demesure Says:
   July 17th, 2007 at 4:40 am

   No problem. Very responsive posting function.

3. John A Says:
   July 17th, 2007 at 7:45 am

   I blame the scapegoats

4. Richard Mackey Says:
   August 24th, 2007 at 1:41 am

   I would be most grateful if you would post this recently published paper of mine,
   “Rhodes Fairbridge and the idea that the solar system regulates the Earth’s climate”
   on your website. The paper was published in the most recent issue of the Journal of Coastal Research.
   As is usual for publication in a leading international scientific journal my paper was subject to a rigorous peer review.
   Here is the Abstract of my paper:
   a special connection with Australia. In July, 1912 his father Kingsley established Fairbridge Village near Perth.
   It contains a chapel of elegant simplicity designed by one of the world’s most famous architects of the time, Sir
   Herbert Baker, as a labour of love to commemorate Kingsley. Rhodes is one of the few scientists to research the
   sun/climate relationship in terms of the totality of the sun’s impact on the earth (i.e. gravity, the electromagnetic
   force and output and their interaction). When the totality of the sun’s impact is considered, having regard to the
   relevant research published over the last two decades, the influence of solar variability on the earth’s climate is
   very strongly non-linear and stochastic. Rhodes also researched the idea that the planets might have a role in
   producing the sun’s variable activity. If they do and if the sun’s variable activity regulates climate, then
   ultimately the planets may regulate it. Recent research about the sun/climate relationship and the solar inertial
   motion (sim) hypothesis shows a large body of circumstantial evidence and several working hypotheses but no
   satisfactory account of a physical sim process. In 2007 Ulysses will send information about the solar poles. This
   could be decisive regarding the predictions about emergent Sunspot Cycle No 24, including the sim hypothesis.
   According to the sim hypothesis, this cycle should be like Sunspot Cycle No 14, and be followed by two that will
   create a brief ice age. During the 1920s and ‘30s Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology published research about
   the sun/climate relationship, especially Sunspot Cycle No 14, showing that it probably caused the worst drought
   then on record.

   Here is the last paragraph
   In his many publications (for example, NORTH (2005)),
   Douglass North stresses that if the issues with which we are
   concerned, such as global warming and the global commons,
   belong in a world of continuous change (that is, a non-ergodic
   world), then we face a set of problems that become exceedingly
   complex. North stresses that our capacity to deal effectively with
   uncertainty is essential to our succeeding in a non-ergodic world.
   History shows that regional effects of climate change are highly
   variable and that the pattern of change is highly variable. An
   extremely cold (or hot) year can be followed by extremely hot (or
   cold) year. Warming and cooling will be beneficial for some
   regions and catastrophic for others. Brian Fagan has documented
   in detail relationships between the large-scale and generally
   periodic changes in climate and the rise and fall of civilisations,
   cultures and societies since the dawn of history. The thesis to
   which Rhodes Fairbridge devoted much of his life is that the sun,
   through its relationships with the solar system, is largely
   responsible for these changes and that we are now on the cusp of
   one of the major changes that feature in the planet’s history. As
   Douglass North showed, the main responsibility of governments
   in managing the impact of the potentially catastrophic events that
   arise in a non-ergodic world is to mange society’s response to
   them so as to enable the society to adapt as efficiently as possible
   to them. Amongst other things, this would mean being better able
   to anticipate and manage our response to climate change, to
   minimise suffering and maximise benefits and the efficiency of
   our adaptation to a climate that is ever-changing – sometimes
   catastrophically – but generally predictable within bounds of
   uncertainty that statisticians can estimate. At the very least, this
   requires that the scientific community acts on the wise counsel of
   Rhodes W Fairbridge and presents governments with advice that
   has regard to the entire field of planetary-lunar-solar dynamics,
   including gravitational dynamics. This field has to be understood
   so that the dynamics of terrestrial climate can be understood.

   Here is the link to the paper: www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/pdf/ICS176.pdf
   Here is the link to the Journal:
   www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/

Leave a Comment