Warmists spat over CSIRO sacking noted Oceanographer
December 24th, 2011 by Warwick HughesI see this reported in the Canberra Times – “Scientist’s services no longer required”. Of course the article gives little idea as to what the good Dr. Trevor McDougall has done to fall out with top CSIRO pooh-bahs.
Does any reader have a clue ? Google has a lot of refs but just now my internet is only half of dialup so it is too slow to search myself.
Added 25th: The print copy of the CT quotes un-named people at the Max Planck Institute and NOAA / Princeton U – as writing to the CSIRO and Fed politicians in support of Dr. McDougall.
But I note “A PhD project to improve the accuracy of climate models”
and also “Redefinition of “seawater” to aid climate research” – both of these areas could be minefields if you were in any slight way lacking in appropriate pro-IPCC sensitivities.
Posted in IPCC, News and Views | 8 Comments »
December 24th, 2011 at 10:27 am
[...] Warmists spat over CSIRO sacking noted Oceanographer [...]
December 24th, 2011 at 10:59 am
Surely this quote from him shows why.
“The key to being a good oceanographer is to think differently from everyone else. If you think the same as everyone else, you can get papers published and you can have a reasonable career. But to think differently means that you may come up with quite original ideas that may change oceanographic practice forever”.
Obviously anyone who thinks differently isn’t going to regurgitate the same old line. Dangerous stuff THINKING, it could lead to wondering if certain authorities are right.
December 24th, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Prince Albert I medal recipient 2011
iapso.iugg.org/medals-and-awards/the-prince-albert-i-medal
December 25th, 2011 at 8:50 am
What a disgrace for the once mighty and impeccable CSIIRO.
December 26th, 2011 at 1:55 pm
the CSIRO is infested with green so this guy must have said or done something wrong.
- www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/csiro-denies-its-head-megan-clark-has-any-conflict-of-interest-over-carbon-store-role/story-fn59niix-1226170818106
www.csiro.au/Portals/About-CSIRO/Who-we-are/Executive/Executive-Team/MikeWhelan.aspx
December 27th, 2011 at 8:56 am
Jim Salinger of South Hobart, Tasmania writes to the Canberra Times (Letters, December 27) of reading about Trevor McDougall’s redundancy with extreme disappointment and links it to events in his own past. “In 2009, I was summarily dismissed from New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research”.
Added 27 Dec Ed. – John – the Canberra Times has the letter online;
He goes on to blow his own trumpet with a quote from a The New Zealand Herald editorial at the time.
“Clearly matters have gone too far when scientists speak of fleeing institutes because of the draconian rules. And they have gone way too far when a scientist who is arguably, NIWA’s top asset is dismissed for what, according to the institute itself is a matter of the utmost triviality”.
He goes on to state “this is a dark day for CSIRO science indeed. Those engaged in the activity in CSIRO are slaves of the system”.
He continues to toot as he completes his letter with “I hope that sense will prevail and that the very talented McDougall will be picked up by a top Australian university or elsewhere, where he will have the freedom to continue his valuable contribution to oceanic science. That is what happened to me”.
December 28th, 2011 at 8:54 am
to add to the confusion
www.the-funneled-web.com/N&V_2011(Jan-Dec)/N&V_1112/news__views_item_dec_2011-111225a.htm
December 28th, 2011 at 12:53 pm
couldn’t find an appropriate post – but if you want to review the First Order Draft of the WGI contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), Climate Change 2013
here’s the spot to register
fod.ipcc.unibe.ch/registration/