|Description of the new CRUT3
(land only) and HadCRUT3 (land & sea) global datsets by the Hadley
Brohan, P., Kennedy, J.J., Harris, I., Tett, S.F.B. and Jones, P.D., 2006: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new dataset from 1850. J Geophys Res, 111, D12106
|I commented on large differences
between the deceptively named CRUT3 by the Hadley Centre and the Jones
et al CRUT2. Also see web page.
See also, Hadley Centre inserts more warming into New Zealand climate history
Supporting web page.
Have a look at the ridiculous HadCRUT3 outlier errors in 2003 in New Zealand region SST's , work in progress, more errors to present, I need staff.
© European Geosciences Union 2006
Surface radiative forcings and effects on heat waves and greenhouse warming over the last decades in Europe
R. Philipona (1,2), B. Dürr (2) and C. Ruckstuhl (3)
(1) Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, Switzerland, (2) MeteoSwiss, Zürich, Switzerland, (3) Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland (email@example.com)
Ah, now they discover the cause of the 2003 heat wave.
|The issue that catches my eye
here is the "about turn" from their 2004 and 2005 conclusions, implicit
in their findings now emphasizing that SOLAR radiation drove the
2003 heat wave but that their greenhouse forcing is driving
decadal warming over Europe. See exact quote below from their Abstract
Overall our analysis indicates that heat waves are driven by strong but short-term shortwave forcing, whereas the rapid warming in Europe over the last two decades is primarily related to longwave greenhouse forcing and a strong water vapor feedback.
|Philipona, R., B. Dürr, A.
Ohmura, and C. Ruckstuhl (2005), Anthropogenic
greenhouse forcing and
strong water vapor feedback increase temperature in Europe,
Res. Lett., 32, L19809, doi:10.1029/2005GL023624. PDF paper can be
bought from AGU for US$9
||My interest in this paper was
sparked by claims on the Jennifer Marohasy Blog.
I have been surprised to find that the Philipona et al conclusions are so strongly influenced by their choice of the 1995-2002 period .
|Vose et al 2005, "An
intercomparison of trends in surface air temperature analyses at the
global, hemispheric, and grid-box scale", Russell S. Vose, David
Wuertz, and Thomas C.Peterson Climate Analysis Branch, National
Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina, USA P. D. Jones
Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich,
UK,GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 32, L18718,
||See my Blog entry, "Is this 2005 paper by leading IPCC
climate scientists, deceptive ?" March 6th, 2007
and linked web page with new map showing huge differences between CRU and GHCN grid cells.
forcing outweighs decreasing solar radiation driving rapid
temperature rise over land
Rolf Philipona and Bruno Du¨rr
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Received 6 July 2004; revised 1 September 2004; accepted 25 October 2004; published 25 November 2004.
|They show data to end 2003 which
obviously includes the 2003 heat wave. Yet arrive at completely
different conclusions about the 2003 warming compared to
their 2006 paper, Abstract above, where short wave (solar)
invoked for the 2003 event.
|"A closer look
at United States and global surface temperature change", by J.
Hansen, R. Ruedy, M. Sato of NASA Goddard Institute for
Space Studies NY, M. Imhoff, W. Lawrence of NASA
Goddard Space Flight Center MD and D. Easterling, T. Peterson and
T. Karl of NOAA National Climatic Data Center NC.
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 106, NO. D20, PAGES,
I am sure interested readers can obtain a copy of this paper from GISS.
adjustments insert warming into rural stations
While working on the Florida 5 degree grid cell page, strange high warming trends were apparent in GISS (NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York) graphics at their web site for (at least) two rural stations, Arcadia and Everglades.
Includes comments from Dr J Hansen by email
This habit of GISS has also been noted in Swedish data.
ClimateAudit has several posts on these issues. This one shows how GISS warms more than HadCRUT3 over the USA 48 States.
The ClimateAudit search module will find more if you look for giss urban cooling
|Easterling, D.R. et al., 1997,
"Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe", Science, 277,
David R. Easterling, Briony Horton, Philip D. Jones,Thomas C. Peterson, Thomas R. Karl, David E. Parker, M. James Salinger, Vyacheslav Razuvayev, Neil Plummer, Paul Jamason, Christopher K. Folland.
|This landmark paper
authored by eleven members of the pro-IPCC climate
establishment, is one in a decade long rich tradition
of obfuscating and minimising true Urban Heat Island (UHI)
contamination of datasets by clever misuse of the data aided and
abetted by comradely referrees and sleepy editors. Marvel at the
error ridden colour maps. Peer review ?, what peer review !!
|Karl et al 1993, "A New
Perspective on Recent Global Warming: Asymmetric Trends of Daily
Maximum and Minimum Temperature", Thomas R. Karl, Philip D.
Jones, Richard W. Knight, George Kukla, Neil
Plummer, Vyacheslav Razuvayev, Kevin P. Gallo,
Janette Lindseay, Robert J. Charlson, and Thomas C. Peterson.
Downloadable as pdf at BAMS
|This paper is notable for its
Fig 7 where the UHI contamination in Chinese and Japanese simply leaps
out of the page. Yet these august authors fail to "get the
message" in their Abstract, or conclusions.
Another whitewash of T data which does everything to ignore the UHI effect. As I say, "turning a blind eye."
|The Jones et al 1990 Letter to Nature:
a rebuttal of some key points
Jones PD, Groisman PYa, Coughlan M, Plummer N, Wang WC, Karl TR (1990) Assessment of urbanization effects in time series of surface air temperatures over land. Nature 347:169-172. Scanned pages available.
|This paper is still a vital brick in the IPCC wall of denial of UHI influence in global T trends. This paper has been extensively reviewed and rebutted from the link opposite. This work is ongoing and has been addressed in several posts at ClimateAudit in 2007 which are linked to at the bottom of the " Jones et al 1990 Letter to Nature" page at left.|
|1986, Urban Warming, G. Kukla, J.
Gavin, and T.R. Karl
Journal of Applied Meteorology, Volume 25, Issue 9 (September 1986)
To download pdf copy
Click on Urban Warming to read my comments
The point I am making is that Jones et al 1986, (see below) published in the same year and in the same Journal used 10 of Kukla et al's USA cities in their Northern Hemisphere compilation.
Yet Kukla, Gavin and Karl did not Comment in the Journal on this significant contradiction of their work.
|Northern Hemisphere Surface Air
Temperature Variations: 1851-1984
P.D. Jones, S.C.B. Raper, P.M. Kelly, and T.M.L. Wigley, R.S. Bradley and H.F. Diaz;
Journal of Applied Meteorology: Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 161-179.
|Review starts at top of page.
Great insights into what Jones et al actually did can be gleaned by
reading scanned pages of the "Comment by Wood 1988 and the Wigley and
Jones reply in which they list 9 errors in Wood's analysis. See my Table juxtaposing
their points with what Wood said.
See my point by point comments, make your own mind up.
|Southern Hemisphere Surface Air
Temperature Variations: 1851–1984
P.D. Jones, S.C.B. Raper, and T.M.L. Wigley;
Journal of Applied Meteorology: Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1213–1230.
|Scroll down to,
 Tasman Institute 1991 review of the Australian component of temperature records used in the 1986 Jones et al Southern Hemisphere paper,
My first review of seminal Jones et al hemsispheric compilations that gave us "IPCC Global Warming as we now know it"